Linux Kernel

Leaked version of surfaces Android 13 with new features and minor changes

11351663

lefedabi, 2 hours agoyeah yeah “iOS is more advanced than Android in many ways” Wait till Apple & … moreStop being a fanboy.
I had a split screen since 2012, thanks to Samsung Note 2, so Google didn’t help there.

Many innovations have come to our handsets from many areas and competitors. This is a good thing. Encourage competition and innovation. Don’t be narrow-minded, don’t get carried away by “they copied us” etc. You shouldn’t reject products because of a logo. Be grateful to Apple and all Android participants who are pushing the boundaries in different ways.

I5018

Kangal, 5 hours agoI don’t need an amateur YouTuber like MKBHD to tell me which one is more fluid. I prefer to judge … moreYeah yeah
“iOS is more advanced than Android in many ways”
Wait for Apple to “invent” the split screen that Google has had since Android 5

D

Tiny adjustments are barely worth the effort and nothing exciting. It would be better to have release cycles of two or three years.

?

  • Anonymous
  • U @ x

rizki1, 4 hours agoI’m more excited about the new skinned Android updates than the stock.True 👍

w

Kangal, 5 hours agoI don’t need an amateur YouTuber like MKBHD to tell me which one is more fluid. I prefer to judge … moreSad !

?

  • Anonymous
  • MyX

Kangal, 5 hours agoI don’t need an amateur YouTuber like MKBHD to tell me which one is more fluid. I prefer to judge … morenice essay that nobody will read

r1351247

I’m more excited about the new skinned Android updates than the stock.

11351663

lefedabi, 8 hours agoWatch YouTube comparing the S21 ultra to the iPhone 13 pro max, you will see which one is more fluid A … moreI don’t need an amateur YouTuber like MKBHD to tell me which one is more fluid.
Rather, I judge on the basis of more objective and professional facts in this area. Or better yet, I can make this comparison between the two phones myself.

You said Android 12 is at least 10 years ahead of iOS 15.
…. that is certainly not true.
On the contrary, iOS is more advanced than Android in many ways, as I have already shown above. Whereas Android was designed with a different concept in mind.

Android OS must compete with Symbian, MeeGo, BadaOS, Tizen, palmOS, webOS, FirefoxOS, BlackberryOS, QNX, Windows Mobile, Windows Phone, etc. It has to compete with all of these potential alternatives. And he has to win against them, so that OEMs choose Google’s AndroidOS. On top of all that, Google needs to make sure they win developers and other big deals. It’s a lot. That is why AndroidOS was designed with an open source design, using the legacy Linux kernel and an operating system with Java. It is malleable and can accept code in several ways.

iOS doesn’t have to. Apple competes with itself. iOS is all about security, performance, and efficiency. This is why iOS is slowly evolving to become more complex, while Android is evolving to try to become lighter.

Google couldn’t just build its own iPhone and dominate the ecosystem with Android. They would certainly have failed. They needed OEMs to make the phones and instead embraced Google as their ecosystem. And Google didn’t have the developers that Apple and Microsoft did, they needed to attract everyone, which is why their SDK was so open. They ended up acquiring a small California company called “Android” and using it to develop a competitor Blackberry. Which they changed at the last minute after the original iPhone was unveiled. And suffice it to say they were in the right place, at the right time, with the right team, the right money and the right connections. And as they say, history has done its thing, and here we are.

^ Now that context was absolutely necessary, in order to explain why the two ecosystems are what they are.

Google did what it took to get to this position. If Google had bought Nokia at its peak in 2005, the situation would have been different. Then they could have developed the ecosystem to be more stable, less configurable, less open and more robust. But their talks failed and they followed the other plan described above.

After all that has been said, Apple turned out to be correct and Google was wrong. You need to design your ecosystem to be secure first, then successful, then efficient. Other aspects such as feature set and openness are secondary priorities. Apple’s task is difficult, but they have steadily made progress in evolving iOS to be more open and have more features. While Google’s task is impossible, try to get slimmer. It becomes increasingly impossible to make software more efficient over time, as Moore’s Law shows. Again, Google was unsuccessful in their talks with Nokia in 2005, and they didn’t have the privilege / position they have now.

Despite all of this, I am an Android user. iOS is great, but it’s a personal choice for me. It is because of their different foundations that they both have their unique strengths and weaknesses. For example, Apple makes it easy for developers to build apps, providing the best SDK in the industry. Google does a lousy job at this. However, Google allows developers to build Android apps using many different languages ​​and code bases, while Apple limits you to two / three. The Android Market is a free and open space for most developers to share their code. IOS apps are organized, so it’s a walled garden, but it ensures higher quality at the expense of quantity. iOS operating system is more optimized on hardware, but Android operating system can be modified by OEM to run on other devices (watch, main unit, refrigerator, smart tv, home assistant, etc. .).
… so I really like Apple and all their innovations, but I choose Android!

?

  • Anonymous
  • U @ x

Anonymous, 6 hours agoSigh .. Android fanboys still have high hopes. Hahah. Fuchsia or not, they will always be … more2025

?

  • Anonymous
  • UG4

Sigh .. Android fanboys still have high hopes. Hahah.

Fuchsia or not, they will always be a transition state, in which Android apps will perform poorly on the new platform. Ditto with the migration from Intel to the Macs Arm. Apple has been undercover for years for the migration.

Samsung won’t be so quick to put all the eggs in one basket. So I guess they’re going to test some hardware for the new OS, test the water. And they would need Google’s help… to migrate so many Android APIs to the new kernel… they have to keep the Android apps alive until the developer can migrate to the new operating system.

So I’m guessing it will take 2028 or 2030 for fuchsia to qualify as a viable mainstream.

T10528

Fuchsia os will take over in the future, android will die soon

?

  • Anonymous
  • U @ x

Johnclinton94, 9 hours agoI have a feeling that earlier each smartphone manufacturer would have their own operating system, just like hua … moreAll current Android users will simply switch to fuchsia from 2025.

This is the year that Google has planned for the transition.

Samsung’s only change isn’t the case, literally every current Android OEM will go fuchsia.

?

  • Anonymous
  • rv8

Just hope they bring the play store too

J

Johnclinton94, 9 hours agoI have a feeling that earlier each smartphone manufacturer would have their own operating system, just like hua … moreFuschia is also google

I5018

Kangal, 8 hours agoJust compare the iPhone 13 Max to the Samsung S21 +. They are close in terms of physics … moreWatch YouTube comparing S21 ultra vs iPhone 13 pro max, you will see which one is smoother
A user interface is the most fluid between each user interface
Also, people here hate Apple because they can’t install modified and cracked apps.
Plus, Android has a lot of features that Apple hasn’t invented yet.
And wait until S22 series sell to clear iscam 13 from earth

11351663

lefedabi, 9 hours agoAndroid is already 10 years ahead of iosJust compare the iPhone 13 Max to the Samsung S21 +.
They are similar in terms of physical size, screen properties, and battery life. Still, iOS still runs a lot faster with the Apple A15, and it runs a lot longer. There are at least two generations there.

This is what you can achieve with vertical integration.
The hardware is faster and more efficient. Third-party developers spend more time optimizing the platform. The code is closer to native (Swift vs Java), and the same goes for graphics (Metal2 vs Vulkan1). The operating system can have its fair share of bugs and security issues, but it’s still much more secure and stable than AndroidOS, even with the OneUI changes. And if we’re talking about backward compatibility, Apple’s Hybrid Translation (Rosetta2) can run x86 programs on their ARM platform, much more, better, faster, and more efficiently than Windows x86 programs on a Windows-ARM. device with their official (slow) emulation layer.

So even though we “hate” Apple here in the comments section, we should all be grateful for their efforts and the innovations they’ve bought in the market. More competition is better for innovation.

I5018

Android is already 10 years ahead of ios

J753

I have a feeling that sooner every smartphone maker would have their own operating system just like Huawei has already switched to Harmony OS and Samsung is already working on fuchsia looking at the way Android makes skins out of junk

?

  • Anonymous
  • J7S

I think they are out of ideas. google thinks to replace android anyway


Source link